Also, the vendor might choose to be open if its system has minuscule market share and needs to fast-track market penetration with the help of more established technology partners. Some CAD/CAM technology vendors might claim that using open-architecture systems is an advantage, but picture their scenario: if a company only makes a digital scanner, they need to integrate with other technology vendors in order to remain relevant in the marketplace.
WHAT IS OPEN DENTAL SOFTWARE
For example, if a dentist or lab owner cobbles together a CAD/CAD system using equipment from a different scanner manufacturer, a different software manufacturer, and a different milling machine manufacturer and then produces a poor quality restoration, what caused the problem? Was it a bad scan, a software bug, or a milling defect? The more companies you bring into the CAD/CAM equation, the more problems and incompatibilities can occur.
One weak link in the system can have a negative impact on a dentist’s production efficiency and the esthetic quality of the finished restorations. Therefore, every component must be compatible in clinical functionality and performance, while meeting the highest quality standards. Sirona executives have explained to me that the company chose to be selectively open because it believes in taking a systems approach to chairside and dental laboratory CAD/CAM. These are the kinds of things that dentists should care about, but in reality do not have the time or access to the market intelligence required to make a sound evaluation. Sirona’s policy is to make its CEREC CAD/CAM technology compatible with third-party components on a case-by-case basis, contingent on very strict third-party partner criteria, such as product quality, service record, market share, and financial stability. The underlying philosophy for selectively open architecture is that quality is far better than quantity when forging technology partnership agreements.ĬEREC ® by Sirona Dental Systems is the leading example of a selectively open CAD/CAM system. This can be a nightmare for a busy dentist, especially one who is gradually evolving toward a high-tech practice.īy comparison, a selectively open-architecture CAD/CAM system enables integration with other vendors, but only with components manufactured by the most reputable dental industry companies, which must meet the strictest criteria of the CAD/CAM manufacturer. There may also be the complexity and inconvenience of multiple-vendor installations, service, warranties, and training. However, there is no guarantee that a multiple-vendor component system will integrate seamlessly or perform optimally. In other words, closed-architecture systems are fully proprietary, whereas an open-architecture CAD/CAM system can be integrated with the components manufactured by many outside vendors.Īt first glance, an open-architecture CAD/CAM system may seem to be the way to go, given the flexibility of component choice. The main difference between a closed-architecture CAD/CAM system and an open-architecture CAD/CAM system is that a closed-architecture CAD/CAM system does not integrate with any components manufactured by another company. Hopefully, I can provide some clarification. Although these terms are used commonly in the computer and other high-tech industries, they may be unfamiliar to the average dentist. In recent months, there has been an increased amount of discussion in the dental industry regarding open, closed, and selectively open architecture with respect to dental chairside CAD/CAM systems.
0 kommentar(er)
